The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 included new tax reporting requirements to the IRS mandating that certain firms report the adjusted cost basis of sold securities, including whether the gain or loss is short or long-term. Because of this, the Form 1099-B for 2011 from custodians like Schwab and TD Ameritrade will look different when clients receive them in mid-February of 2012.
We have tracked cost basis for clients for years for many reasons. Chief among these is that we strive to have our clients paying only taxes that are necessary. Without proper tracking, it is difficult to manage the taxation. We see the potential for these new regulations to make proper reporting easier on everyone – eventually. We say “eventually” because the requirements phase in over three years, starting in 2011. Even after all phases are complete, securities purchased before January 1, 2011 will remain “uncovered”.
The first phase took effect on January 1, 2011, covering equities (stocks) acquired on or after that date. These changes will be most noticeable on the new Form 1099-B, reporting cost basis information. Cost basis information on any equities bought and sold in 2011 will also be reported to the IRS.
The second phase begins on January 1, 2012, covering mutual funds, dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs) and most exchange traded funds (ETFs) acquired on or after that date. Brokers will be required to report this information to the IRS for the first time in 2013 on Form 1099-B, covering the 2012 tax year.
The third and final phase takes effect on January 1, 2013, covering other specified securities, including fixed income and options. The IRS had not yet issued regulations on this phase as of the date of this writing.
Cost basis default method. The legislation requires custodians to use a default cost basis method for calculating gains and losses unless a client or advisor acting on behalf of the client chooses another method. For equities, the IRS default on sold securities is the First In First Out (FIFO) method. We can change the default method or override it for a specific trade.
Specified lot decisions before the trade settles. For all securities, specifying a lot or changing cost basis method must be done at the time of trade or before settlement date, typically within three days for equities and one day for mutual funds. Once the trade settles, the method used will be final and cannot be changed.
Transfer of cost basis information. The legislation specifies that brokerages must provide a transfer statement when transferring assets to another brokerage firm. Transfer statements for covered securities must include the transfer date, security identifier, acquisition date, covered or uncovered status, cost basis and holding period. This will be very helpful when accounts are transferred to our care as many brokerage firms lacked thoroughness in this area.
Gifted and inherited shares transferred between accounts. When gifted and inherited shares are transferred between accounts, they must be identified and applicable accounting rules must be applied to the gain/loss. For gifted shares, this includes capturing the date of the gift and the donor’s adjusted cost basis and the fair market value (FMV) of the shares on the date of the gift. If the donor’s adjusted basis exceeds the FMV when the gift is made, special rules apply that limit the loss the gift recipient can claim when the shares are sold. For inherited shares, the brokerage firm is generally required to value the security on the date of the account holder’s death unless the estate executor instructs the use of an alternate date.
Tracking and reporting on wash sales. The new law requires the reporting of loss deferrals and other adjustments on Form 1099-B. However, brokerages are required to analyze only identical securities within a single account to determine if a wash sale has occurred. Clients are still obligated to apply the wash sale rules across all of their accounts for substantially identical securities when preparing their tax returns. This is rarely a problem for our clients because we typically manage all of their accounts.
Average cost method. There are several methods available to optimize the gains and losses generated in taxable accounts. We often begin work with new clients that did not know this or were not made aware of this by their prior advisor and used average cost basis for their mutual funds. Normally once one uses average cost, they are stuck with that method for the life of that fund. Coming with the second phase of the legislation, clients will be able to move out of average cost to another method but only for shares purchased after the change and only if they subsequently do not use average cost for these newly purchased shares.
Does the method chosen make much difference? It certainly can. Here is a hypothetical example of a position in the ABC mutual fund with varying purchase dates and a $1,486.31 dividend reinvestment (Lot #6).
How is the realized gain affected by various cost basis methods?
Selling $5,000 of ABC Company on 11/28/2011
Clearly, the accounting method can make a big difference. In this case, while the total sales proceeds were $5,000, the difference between the largest gain and the largest loss is $4,988.52. The more volatile the price fluctuations, the bigger this difference can be. The unwary will never make an affirmative choice and may lock themselves into using the average cost method, eliminating the option to choose in the future.
Also of note is that the LIFO method resulted in the sale of shares less than one year after their purchase (lot 6), causing a short term gain. That $278.81 gain is taxed as ordinary income, a rate that is higher than the long term capital gain rate for every tax bracket. Taxpayers in the highest tax bracket would pay 35% instead of 15% for federal taxes and those in the lowest bracket would pay 10% instead of nothing. This transaction resulted in a modest gain but the difference in rates makes avoiding large short term gains advisable.
We have managed these decisions for clients for years so while these new reporting regulations and the variety of accounting methods can be confusing to some, we do not see them as something to be feared or a burden to navigate. It is all part of the job and we are happy to do it.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please give us a call or send us a note.
If you are not a client and you wish to receive emails notifications of new posts – no more than monthly – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, subscribe via RSS feed or follow us on Google+, LinkedIn, or Twitter
Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC is an Orlando, Tampa and Melbourne, Florida based fee-only financial planner serving central Florida and clients across the country. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC specializes in providing objective financial planning, retirement planning, and investment management to help clients build, manage, grow, and protect their assets through all phases of one’s life and the many transitions in between. If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything further, please give us a call or send us a note. If you are not a client and wish to receive emails notifying you of new posts – no more than once per month – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
Important Additional Information & Disclosures
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC-“MFT”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.
Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MFT.
Please remember that if you are a MFT client, it remains your responsibility to advise MFT, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MFT is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Tax advice is given only to clients and only when agreed to by MFT. A copy of the MFT’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.
Please Note: MFT does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to MFT’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
Please Note: Limitations: While MFT does NOT pay for recognition, awards, or publicity, neither rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services, publications, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation or certification, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if MFT is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of MFT by any of its clients. ANY QUESTIONS: MFT’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including providing the criteria used for any reflected ranking.
Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your MFT account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your MFT accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request.