Beginning in late summer of every election year, the media begins to predict how the markets may behave for the two major political parties and give airtime to the campaigns that are actively trying to get us worked up. As financial advisors, we are now fielding questions like, “They say that if “Mr. X” wins this election, the economy will be devastated. How can I position my portfolio to avoid getting wiped out if X wins?”
We use “Mr. X” because we get the question, or a variation of it, with both President Obama and Governor Romney as Mr. X. We have heard passionate and reasonable arguments about the approaches of both candidates and their parties as to our country’s economic issues. We suspect concern will grow as we approach Election Day. With that in mind, let’s take a closer look at the question.
Historical data is often used to imply that one party is “better” for the markets. All candidates want you to believe that their election will ensure your prosperity. What does the data tell us? Not much. If you see a headline or story that claims that market history implies a specific election outcome will result in a specific market outcome, or that in certain years of an administration certain results will ensue, ignore the article. The data and common sense do not support the article’s suggestion.
Markets have done well for both Democratic and Republican presidents, on average. Since the S&P 500 index was created in 1927, the average result is higher for Democratic presidents. However, the data shows that whenever the Republicans control either the House, the Senate, or both, the average result is better than when Democrats control both chambers of the legislature.
During the 2004 campaign, financial media made note of a statistic from Standard and Poors that showed since 1945, the S&P 500 index of stocks returned an average of 12.9% in the year after the party that occupies the White House stayed in the White House. However, when a change of party occurred, the average was a loss of 3.2%. That’s a big enough gap that many would think it compelling. It isn’t. Those averages come from only 12 data points and the variance around the averages cited is large.
Mark Twain once said about averages: “A man with one foot in hot coals and the other in a bucket of ice is quite comfortable, on average.”
It is easy to read too much into statistics. This is a common flaw of how the human brain functions. We seek patterns and cause and effect relationships to make sense of the world. The media thrives on placing too much emphasis on, or surmising a pattern, based on a very small sample size. There is simply no statistically significant difference between the various combinations of Presidential and Congressional parties (Riepe 2004).
If you acted on the switching party statistic by loading up on stocks when President George W. Bush was reelected, you were probably disappointed as the S&P 500 earned just 4.9% in 2005, well below the average cited. If you continued to believe the cause and effect implication of the statistic and bailed out of stocks when the Democrats took over expecting a loss, you would have missed out on the index’s 26.46% gain in 2009.
That is the data. On the common sense front, consider the following:
- The market is far more complicated than these simplistic views imply. While there is no doubt the President is highly influential, he alone does not control economic policy and cannot pass laws without Congress. Just a few of the variables are Fed policy, geopolitical turmoil, globalization of trade, private sector competition, and consumer demand in various parts of the world.
- All of the House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate seats are up for grabs every two years. All campaigns for high office generally go the same way. Politicians seek to take credit for anything you like and place blame on anything you do not like. We don’t know who will win the election or how the markets will react. Whether you like how this one comes out or not, the same credit taking and blame placing is just around the corner. The call for change is not new or unique – it is a constant.
- The market is always creating both winners and losers. The policies of some politicians will inevitably benefit some businesses and hurt others. The market will rise and fall in anticipation of what policies will be instituted, which will be continued, and which will end. By the time the fate of these policies is clear, the market will look beyond these policies to other factors that may affect a company’s future and adjust prices based on those anticipations.
- Political labels are imprecise. Democratic President John F. Kennedy was regarded by many as a defense hawk and a tax cutter—positions more typically associated with today’s Republicans.
- We have survived, even thrived, despite some pretty bad presidents and ineffective Congresses
From an investment perspective, we caution you about making big moves in anticipation of market reactions. You should always expect the market to gyrate significantly because that is its normal behavior.
Going back to President Hoover in 1928, we looked at the calendar quarters in which the elections took place and the first two quarters of the following year. 0f those 63 quarters, 32% (20) were negative. If you consider all 323 quarters of the S&P 500’s existence through June 2012, 108 were down. That’s 33%. Bad markets around elections do not happen any more frequently than other times.
In all time periods, you can find stories that place blame or take credit. The market may very well go down and some will want to place blame on the election results. Has there been an election in which the candidates did not suggest trouble if their opponents were elected? We couldn’t find one.
In the coming months, remember these numbers and the simple fact that in all cases of a down market around an election, markets recovered in plenty of time for prudent investors. Rather than interpreting a market drop as a long term disaster, diversified, disciplined, and patient investors view drops as possible short term opportunities due to the lower prices. Whenever markets are down, our rebalancing approach makes us lean toward buying a little at the lower prices.
The more you focus on playing short term events, the more likely you are to lose sight of your goals and the closer you are to being a speculator and not an investor. A well-structured portfolio would be one that is not dependent upon an accurate prediction of who wins the election or the market’s reaction to that result. A good portfolio won’t take more risk than is necessary to reach your goals in the first place. It would be broadly diversified enough that the need to make big bets is avoided and any tactical changes would be done in context of your family’s best interests.
You may have felt a similar anxiety in past elections. Go ahead and formulate your opinions of the candidates and argue on their behalf with all the passion you wish to display but be careful not to go too far. Getting people fired up is a big part of politics but heightened emotions are not conducive to sound financial decision-making.
This is not to imply that who wins doesn’t matter. Without a doubt, the next president will have an effect on the markets, but speculating on what that effect will be is not a sound strategy for investors. We certainly agree that a candidate’s economic positions are relevant to deciding your vote. However, we want to encourage our clients to look at the candidates’ positions on the broader spectrum of issues and not place too much emphasis on meaningless and conflicting data. Mark your calendar – Election Day is Tuesday, November 6th. Please vote but don’t let the hysteria of the race distract you from your family’s goals.
Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC is an Orlando, Tampa and Melbourne, Florida based fee-only financial planner serving central Florida and clients across the country. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC specializes in providing objective financial planning, retirement planning, and investment management to help clients build, manage, grow, and protect their assets through all phases of one’s life and the many transitions in between. If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything further, please give us a call or send us a note. If you are not a client and wish to receive emails notifying you of new posts – no more than once per month – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
Important Additional Information & Disclosures
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC-“MFT”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.
Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MFT.
Please remember that if you are a MFT client, it remains your responsibility to advise MFT, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MFT is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Tax advice is given only to clients and only when agreed to by MFT. A copy of the MFT’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.
Please Note: MFT does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to MFT’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
Please Note: Limitations: While MFT does NOT pay for recognition, awards, or publicity, neither rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services, publications, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation or certification, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if MFT is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of MFT by any of its clients. ANY QUESTIONS: MFT’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including providing the criteria used for any reflected ranking.
Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your MFT account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your MFT accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request.