Tax planning for a Joe Biden presidency
After every presidential election, attention turns to changes the new president wants to make to the tax code and how that may affect financial markets, as well as our clients’ specific financial situations and tax planning.
With the results of the Senate still to be determined, uncertainty reigns. Still, there are a few things we can consider when contemplating what, if anything, our clients need to do.
There have been many differences between what a candidate wants to do with the tax code and what actually gets implemented.
The first thing to keep in mind is that presidential candidates run on a high-level tax policy, not specific legislation. The President does not write our laws, Congress does. There have been many differences between what a candidate wants to do with the tax code and what actually gets implemented. The most recent example was President Trump. He had the help of a clear majority in both houses of Congress, yet still could not get all the provisions he wanted into tax legislation.
It will be even more difficult for President-elect Biden to achieve all the items on which he campaigned. If a Republican wins either of the two Georgia Senate races, sweeping changes are highly unlikely because Republicans will have a majority in the Senate. However, even if both seats are won by Democrats (resulting in essentially a 50/50 split in the Senate), getting big changes passed should be challenging.
Some of the provisions President-elect Biden campaigned for include:
- A new 12.4% social security tax on incomes above $400,000 (split between employers and employees)
- Raising the marginal tax rate on incomes above $400,000 to 39.6%
- Corporate income tax increase from 21% to 28%
- Repeal of the Trump tax cuts (currently set to expire automatically in 2025)
- Long-term capital gains rate increase from 23.8% to 39.6% on incomes above $1,000,000
- Limiting itemized deductions so they can only offset income taxed at 28% or less
Of the above list, only the repeal of the Trump tax cuts would increase taxes on the middle class directly. The clear theme is to increase taxes on high earners. This targeting may present another barrier to change, in addition to the vote counts in Congress.
It is likely that economic conditions due to the efforts to contain COVID-19 will remain poor. Many economic advisors will advise Biden and Congress against making a significant shift in tax policy. Pulling more money out of an economy that is struggling can make matters worse, especially since so many of the provisions target businesses which create jobs.
There is a good possibility that between the vote count, the economy and other legislative priorities, the tax code will not be addressed in earnest immediately after the inauguration.
Tax increases and market behavior
The simple, often repeated narrative is low taxes boost markets and high taxes hurt markets. In yet another example of how markets often do not conform to simple narratives, the historical behavior of the markets after a tax code change is mixed. Recent presidencies give us several examples.
Tax cuts were implemented during the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. The Reagan years were strong for markets, but the Bush years were weak and included two significant declines.
…despite what the simple narrative suggests and the worry we hear from some clients, recent tax increases did not cause a market collapse – quite the contrary.
Similarly, despite what the simple narrative suggests and the worry we hear from some clients, recent tax increases did not cause a market collapse – quite the contrary. Taxes were increased during the Clinton administration, but markets soared in the ‘90s. Likewise, in 2013, the Bush tax cuts expired for high earners and the S&P 500 index of U.S. stocks increased over 32% that year and had positive returns every year after until 2018.
If you are reading about these outcomes and thinking “Yeah, but during that administration such and such happened,” you are correct. You are alluding to a very important point – namely, more goes into creating moves in the markets than just tax policy. Economies and markets are simply too complex to be forced to and fro by one variable for very long.
Since the time frame of a true investor extends beyond the term of any president, you should conclude that making significant shifts in your investment approach based on what is said during a campaign or about tax policy after an election is risky. Like market timing for other reasons, the odds of success are not good and the penalty for being wrong can be severe.
Who should make changes and what should they be?
A cornerstone of tax planning is to consider whether income or deductible expenses should be either accelerated into the current year or deferred into a future year. If taxes are going up, you look to see what income can be put on the books in the lower tax year and which deductions can be delayed to the higher tax year. Tax proposals do not change the wisdom of doing this, but legislation can affect the numbers used in the analysis.
Most people are not considered highly compensated under the Biden proposals and should not be overly concerned about direct increases in their tax bills. We do not believe the proposals present a compelling reason to make any major tax-related moves at this point or abandon a sound investment plan.
For the highly compensated, considering the thin margin the prevailing party will have in the Senate, it does not appear likely the significant tax increases listed above will pass as proposed for 2021, and 2022 may be difficult too. Nonetheless, there will be pressure to pass something. As more clarity around the vote count in the Senate appears and as support or lack of support for specific proposals arise in Congress, we should be prepared to act.
What we will likely recommend is to accelerate income or capital gains into the tax year prior to passed tax increases becoming effective. We mentioned several reasons it will be hard for Congress to pass legislation with big changes right away. It will likely be even harder to make any increase retroactive.
Though we would never guarantee anything when it comes to guessing what Congress will do, we should have time to plan for tax code changes. The best bet is to stick with your financial plan, stick to the tried and true methods of tax planning, and do not get too wound up over simplistic narratives espoused by politicians or the media. Diversification, patience, and discipline have proven their worth through many tax code changes and should again in the coming years.
Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC is an Orlando, Tampa and Melbourne, Florida based fee-only financial planner serving central Florida and clients across the country. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC specializes in providing objective financial planning, retirement planning, and investment management to help clients build, manage, grow, and protect their assets through all phases of one’s life and the many transitions in between. If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything further, please give us a call or send us a note. If you are not a client and wish to receive emails notifying you of new posts – no more than once per month – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
Important Additional Information & Disclosures
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC-“MFT”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.
Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MFT.
Please remember that if you are a MFT client, it remains your responsibility to advise MFT, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MFT is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Tax advice is given only to clients and only when agreed to by MFT. A copy of the MFT’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.
Please Note: MFT does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to MFT’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
Please Note: Limitations: While MFT does NOT pay for recognition, awards, or publicity, neither rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services, publications, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation or certification, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if MFT is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of MFT by any of its clients. ANY QUESTIONS: MFT’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including providing the criteria used for any reflected ranking.
Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your MFT account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your MFT accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request.