What to expect from financial markets

One of the keys to successful investing is understanding what to expect from financial markets. 2018 marked the first calendar year the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped since 2015. On Christmas Eve, the S&P 500 Index (S&P) was 20% lower (excluding dividends) than its high point. The S&P tracks so-called “blue chip” stocks, stocks of some of the largest and best-known companies in America and is often used as a proxy for the U.S. stock market.

It is fair to say 2018, like most years, was choppy. Unfortunately, the media seems to think 2018’s behavior either gives a clue of what will come or was very odd.

Neither is true. The data is clear. There is no “serial correlation” in returns, meaning past returns have no predictive value. In fact, a Vanguard study showed the amount of rainfall had more predictive power about future returns than did prior returns. There are no patterns and there are no reliable market timing indicators.

How noteworthy was 2018’s market behavior? It was choppier than average but far from an oddity. There is usually plenty of drama in the stock market and the shorter the time frame, the more up and down the behavior becomes. To have a successful experience, an investor must understand the basics of how markets behave. Possibly the most fundamental characteristic of the markets is that the long-term track record of stocks is excellent, but the short-term behavior can be very challenging.

To have a successful experience, an investor must understand the basics of how markets behave.

On a daily basis, owning stocks is little better than a coin flip. Extending the time frame lowers the odds of losing money and increases the odds of being rewarded. From January 1926 through October 2018, the S&P 500 has closed up on[i][ii]:

53% of days

63% of months

69% of 3-month periods

75% of 12-month periods

88% of 5-year periods

95% of 10-year periods and

100% of 20-year periods.


Further, stocks dropped cumulatively more than 10% at some point during 38% of the calendar years between 1926 and 2018. 20% declines occurred in 25% of the calendar years and the average intra-year drop was over 13%.



S&P Total Returns January 1926 through October 2018 - Dan Moisand discusses what to expect from financial markets

Diversify with other stocks

We don’t believe investing solely in blue chip stocks is the best way to deploy assets. The evidence suggests strongly that diversifying with other stocks can reduce risk or increase return for the same level of risk. You can see the risk reduction in the returns of a more diversified portfolio.

For instance, we will create a hypothetical mix of asset classes (“mix”) and see the resulting returns. One cannot invest directly in any of these indexes but referring to them helps illustrate the concepts. The mix will consist of 30% S&P500, 30% DFA Large Value Index, 10% DFA Small Company Index, 10% DFA Small Value Index, and 20% of the EAFE Index. EAFE stands for Europe, Americas, and Far East and is the oldest broad index of international stocks with data going back to 1970. We include dividends and assume rebalancing annually for any time frame longer than 12 months. From January 1970 through October 2018, the mix has closed up on[iii]:

65% of months vs. 63% for S&P only

72% of 3-month periods vs. 69% for S&P only

82% of 12-month periods vs. 75% for S&P only

95% of 5-year periods vs. 88% for S&P only

100% of 10-year periods vs. 95% for S&P only and

100% of 20-year periods.

Investment returns are chaotic

pen with calculator - Dan Moisand discusses what to expect from financial marketsDiversifying has clearly reduced the risk of loss. Over long time frames the average returns of the mix are usually superior to the blue chips, but this effect is not present in every time period. There is considerable variability. For example, though all three of the asset classes represented by the DFA Large Value Index, DFA Small Company Index and DFA Small Value Index are expected to do better than S&P 500, the norm has been that at least one of these classes lagged the S&P.

We find at least one of these three classes failing to beat the S&P in 56% of one-year periods, in 53% of five-year periods and in 38% of 10-year stretches. Further, on average, in one out of four years, none of them have beaten the blue chips. Nevertheless, as noted above, mixing these asset classes into the portfolio reduces the frequency of losses.

For stability, diversify with high quality, short to intermediate term bonds

The alternative to riding the stock market roller coaster is bonds. From January 1926 through October 2018, the 5-year U.S. Treasury Note has had a positive return over[iv]:

70% of months vs. 63% for S&P

77% of 3-month periods vs. 69% for S&P

90% of 12-month periods vs. 75% for S&P

100% of 5-year periods vs. 88% for S&P

100% of 10-year periods vs. 95% for S&P and

100% of 20-year periods.

As you can see, bonds are much more stable than stocks. This is precisely why they have produced much lower returns than stocks. So low that bonds are very risky when it comes to inflation risk. 5-year notes have failed to keep up with inflation in 26% of 10-year periods and 23% of 20-year periods. Stocks have never failed to beat inflation over 20-year periods and have beaten inflation by almost 7% on average.

Combining stocks and bonds

The most sensible approach to the financial markets is to use stocks for long-term goals that are most vulnerable to inflation and use bonds for stability and to fund short-term goals. A proper ratio of stocks to bonds in a portfolio depends on that individual’s particular situation and is best determined through financial planning.

Regardless of whether stocks are a small or large part of one’s holdings, the stock market will get most of the attention. Consider a 30-year time frame. That’s a good time frame for a short working career or a long retirement. Based on the historical behavior just described, one should expect at least:

133 monthly statements in which stocks were down,

8 calendar years in which stocks dropped at least 20% at some point in the year,

17 years in which at least one diversifying asset class lagged the S&P 500,

8 years in which all the diversifying asset classes lagged the S&P 500, and

1 period in which stocks drop in half or more.

That’s a lot of starts, stops and step backs. It would be easy to feel as though no progress was being made. Patience is critical. In fact, according to an analysis by Tacita Capital, it will feel like stocks are falling 33% of the time, recovering lost ground 38% of the time and progress being made toward new highs in only the remaining 29% of the time.

This time is different. This time is not different.

Historically, financial markets have provided many unsettling periods. Yet despite the drama, markets also produced enough return to sustain those with sound financial plans and reasonable spending levels. It hasn’t mattered that the economic, political, and tax conditions existing in 1930 were dramatically different than those in 1946, 1957, 1966, 1974, 1981, or 2008, just to name a few of the many calendar years in which the S&P dropped 10% or more. Each time has been different, yet the same thing has always happened. Markets settled down and moved up again.

The unhappy truth is no one can predict the future and the investment markets tend to be far less predictable than other areas of life. However, we are not powerless. We have great control over quite a bit, such as the types and amount of risk we assume, the types of products we use, our tax efficiency, our spending/savings rates, the amount and type of information we choose to receive, and most importantly, how we choose to react to that information.

We have examined the household finances of many prospective clients over the years. Fact is we rarely see people fall short of their financial goals due to consequences of the economy or markets, but we often see people risk falling short because of what they do in reaction to economic and market events.

…we often see people risk falling short because of what they do in reaction to economic and market events.

Regardless of what happens, we will do our best to do what needs to be done to improve the odds clients reach their financial goals and objectives. We know what actions to take, such as rebalancing or making trades to help with a tax bill. Should things get worse, we’ll know what to do then too. We’ve been through a lot of market gyrations over the years. The historical record shows unequivocally the issue isn’t whether markets will recover from these crises but whether investors will move out of the market before the recovery comes without carefully considering the trade-offs required for that choice to succeed.

Investing has never been, is not, and never will be easy but the odds of success are very high if one behaves like a true prudent, long-term investor. Being resilient is preferable to being nimble. Consider the numbers above and hopefully the day-to-day drama won’t distract from the facts.

We at Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo are here for you. If you want to chat, we are always happy to receive your call. We will do our best to help by being the Sanctuary From The Noise®. If you are diversified, patient and disciplined, you can stack the odds in your favor. Invest don’t speculate.

News & Notes

New higher contribution limits for retirement accounts in 2019: The IRS announced increases in the maximum contribution to an IRA from $5,500 to $6,000 ($7,000 if age 50 or older) and the maximum employee contribution to a 401(k) increased to $19,000 ($25,000 if over age 50). For a more extensive list of limits see: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/401k-contribution-limit-increases-to-19000-for-2019-ira-limit-increases-to-6000

New tax tables for 2019: Below are the rates applied to taxable income – income after applicable deductions.

Single 2019 Tax Brackets

Taxable Income Tax Bracket:
$0-$9,700 10%
$9,700-$39,475 12%
$39,475-$84,200 22%
$84,200-$160,725 24%
$160,725-$204,100 32%
$204,100-$510,300 35%
$510,300+ 37%

Married Filing Jointly 2019 Tax Brackets

Taxable Income Tax Bracket:
$0-$19,400 10%
$19,400-$78,950 12%
$78,950-$168,400 22%
$168,400-$321,450 24%
$321,450-$408,200 32%
$408,200-$612,350 35%
$612,350+ 37%


Please remember to call us: When anything significant happens in your life, including changes in your finances, family, or health that could affect your financial plan, please let us know so that we can adapt our planning and portfolio work for you accordingly. Also, if you ever fail to receive a monthly statement for one of the Schwab Institutional or TD Ameritrade Institutional accounts under our management, please let us know so we may assure the respective custodian delivers your statements promptly.

Yours truly,

The Team at Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC

[i] Fisher

[ii] Dimensional Fund Advisors

[iii] above graph inspired by Bob Seawright, Above The Market

[iv] Dimensional Fund Advisors

 Contact Us

Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC is an Orlando, Tampa and Melbourne, Florida based fee-only financial planner serving central Florida and clients across the country. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC specializes in providing objective financial planning, retirement planning, and investment management to help clients build, manage, grow, and protect their assets through all phases of one’s life and the many transitions in between. If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything further, please give us a call or send us a note. If you are not a client and wish to receive emails notifying you of new posts – no more than once per month – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, follow us on FacebookLinkedIn, or Twitter.  

Important Additional Information & Disclosures

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC-“MFT”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. 

Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MFT. 

Please remember that if you are a MFT client, it remains your responsibility to advise MFT, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MFT is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Tax advice is given only to clients and only when agreed to by MFT. A copy of the MFT’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.

Please Note: MFT does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to MFT’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Please Note: Limitations:  While MFT does NOT pay for recognition, awards, or publicity, neither rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services, publications, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation or certification, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if MFT is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of MFT by any of its clients.  ANY QUESTIONS: MFT’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including providing the criteria used for any reflected ranking.

Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results.  It should not be assumed that your MFT account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your MFT accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request.


About Dan Moisand

Dan Moisand is a fee-only financial advisor with Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC. He is a regular contributor for multiple outlets, including Florida Today, MarketWatch, and The Wall Street Journal. His writing and financial advice have also been featured in Financial Planning, Investment Advisor, Wealth Manager/Advising Boomers, Forbes, Smart Money, and The New York Times, among other publications. He is the only two-time winner of the Journal of Financial Planning’s “Call for Papers” competition and has been named a top financial planner and advisor by multiple publications. Investment News named Dan one of the “twenty most influential men and women” in the history of financial planning. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for the CFP (Certified Financial Planner) Board.


As a Sanctuary From The Noise®, we only post information we believe timely and important to the long term financial success of our clients. Follow us to receive emails - no more than once a month - about new posts.

We keep your information private and make stopping our emails as easy as starting them.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.