Should I pay off my mortgage?

Should I pay off my mortgage?

One of the most common questions we get, especially as people near retirement is, “Should I pay off my mortgage?”

From a purely conceptual standpoint it’s simple. If you can earn more on your money than you pay by borrowing, your net worth is better by NOT paying off the mortgage. The odds of this working are improved if your mortgage interest rate is low or your investments are structured and managed properly.

The cost of a mortgage

Although the concept regarding paying off your mortgage may be simple, the math is more complex.

We’ll start by determining how much interest you pay when you hold a mortgage. The starting point is, of course, the stated interest rate on your loan. Most mortgages have a fixed rate, but some are variable. In the case of a variable rate, the return required on your investments to come out ahead changes over time. For the duration of this discussion, we will assume a fixed rate mortgage.

The basic formula for your cost of borrowing is: interest rate plus private mortgage insurance (PMI) less tax savings.

image of a house - Dan Moisand discusses the pros and cons of paying off your mortgagePMI is required to protect mortgage lenders. It usually only applies if the home was purchased with a down payment of less than 20% and the current equity in the home is below a certain level. Many people who consider paying off a mortgage have enough equity to avoid PMI.

Mortgage interest is deductible but as an itemized expense on Schedule A of Form 1040. With recent changes to the tax code, most taxpayers no longer itemize, so those homeowners do not get tax savings from their mortgage. One’s ability to itemize deductions can change from year to year, complicating the evaluation somewhat.

Let’s consider a couple who owns a $400,000 residence with $100,000 left on a 4% mortgage scheduled to be paid off in ten years. The equity is high enough that PMI would not apply. Further, with a mortgage that size, they would need to be making thousands of dollars in charitable donations or incurring thousands in unreimbursed health care expenses in order to itemize deductions. Therefore, the cost of borrowing is likely 4%.

Investment considerations

If your investments make 4% after-taxes, the effect on net worth is the same as if you had paid off a mortgage charging 4%. Put another way, the effective rate of return for paying off the mortgage is 4%.

Can our hypothetical homeowner make more than 4% on $100,000 somewhere else? Maybe. That depends on where those investments are made and how they perform.

The first consideration is the type of account in which the $100,000 resides. If the funds would be coming from an IRA or retirement account, the tax bill can swamp the interest savings.  A $100,000 loan at 4% for 10 years requires annual payments of roughly $12,330. A total of $23,330 of interest is paid spread over 10 years.

In order to net $100,000, an IRA withdrawal will incur an upfront tax cost greater than $23,330 if the taxpayer is subject to a marginal tax rate of about 19% or more. In 2020, the marginal rate jumps to 22% at a mere $40,125 of taxable income to a single filer or $80,250 for a married couple filing a joint return. It is usually much better if the money to pay off the mortgage comes from non-retirement accounts.

It is usually much better if the money to pay off the mortgage comes from non-retirement accounts.

The next consideration is the type of investments in which the $100,000 is placed. If the funds are placed in a bank account, the interest received will fall far short of the 4% threshold. There are simply no safe, stable instruments that will net 4% after taxes.

If the $100,000 is in a diversified array of stocks, there is a good chance that those funds will net more than 4% over the next ten years, but it is not guaranteed and there is no chance the growth will come steadily. Stocks and other investments with growth potential are simply not stable in the short term. There have been ten-year periods in which the S&P 500 index of the stocks of large U.S. companies lost money.

A balanced approach is usually a better choice. For instance, a portfolio split 50/50 between stocks and bonds returned an average of 5% or more in 93% of 10-year periods since 1926[i]. The worst 10-year period returned 3.55%, which is close to mortgage rates available today for borrowers with good credit ratings. No one knows what a balanced portfolio will return over the next ten years, but that record is encouraging.

Cash flow considerations

First-time homebuyers often find that the monthly mortgage payment consumes a significant percentage of their income. This level of expense often makes the idea of having no mortgage payment appealing and for many, it becomes a goal.

Our hypothetical homeowner, however, has only ten years left on their mortgage. If they originally had a 30-year loan, their $12,330 of payments feels more like $6,826 today, assuming a 3% inflation rate. As a result, how one values the effect on their cash flow is influenced by each household’s situation.

with many more years to go on their mortgage, there are often far better places for them to direct their cash flow given today’s historically low mortgage rates.

If we change the homeowner to one with many more years to go on their mortgage, there are often far better places for them to direct their cash flow given today’s historically low mortgage rates. Most families like this would be better off keeping their mortgage and doing things like paying down higher interest rate debts, building a cash reserve, adding to tax deductible retirement plans (especially if their company matches contributions), contributing to a Health Savings Account, saving for college, or spending money on experiences that enrich their lives.

Liquidity considerations

What if our hypothetical homeowner only had $100,000 to his name? Paying off the mortgage would mean he would have no liquid reserves and no potential for investment income or significant gains. Real estate does tend to appreciate over time, but usually nowhere near as well as a sound portfolio.

When additional cash is needed, he can’t sell a window. He either sells the whole house, rents out part of the home or borrows the money. Most people who pay off a mortgage want to stay in their home. The potential problems with renting are too numerous to go into here. His situation is probably not attractive to lenders. If he could get a loan, it would probably not be at a good rate.

image from above of a house - Dan Moisand discusses the pros and cons of paying off your mortgageA common but less extreme example of paying off a mortgage and causing a liquidity issue is the homeowner who pays off the mortgage with non-retirement money and is left with the rest of his investments in IRAs or retirement accounts.  He may not have to borrow to get it, but extra cash might be expensive.

A taxpayer in the 22% bracket ($40,125 of taxable income to a single filer or $80,250 for married filing a joint return) needs to distribute $1,282.05 to net $1,000. Basically, everything costs 28.2% more than the price tag. The higher the bracket, the worse this markup becomes.

This tax cost can cause people to spend through their savings at a quicker pace. Similar to taking a lump sum from an IRA to pay off the mortgage, the tax cost can be so high that paying off the mortgage is a bad move even though interest expense is saved.

Intangible considerations

One of the most common reasons to pay off a mortgage, even if the interest rate is low, is the value many people find in owning their home free and clear. For many, it brings great peace of mind, reduces stress, and feels like a safety blanket. This value is hard to quantify, but it is real.

On the other hand, intangible factors such as wanting easy access to assets lead many people to keep their mortgages.  We see this often with clients who contribute to charity regularly, travel a lot, are paying for college or are expecting a significant change to their employment or living arrangements.

People who can maintain a sound, tax-efficient, and moderate-to-aggressive investment portfolio over several years have excellent odds of coming out ahead. This is especially true if they have a low interest rate mortgage loan or can refinance into one.

Like so many of life’s big decisions, the math isn’t the only factor when deciding whether to pay off your mortgage. Your family’s circumstances and preferences can heavily influence the choice. We are here to help you assess the tradeoffs and serve as “A sanctuary from the noise®”.

[i] 50% CRSP 1-10 index, 50% 5-year U.S. Treasuries securities, rebalanced annually, rolling calendar year periods. See additional disclosures for other important details

 Contact Us

Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC is an Orlando, Tampa and Melbourne, Florida based fee-only financial planner serving central Florida and clients across the country. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC specializes in providing objective financial planning, retirement planning, and investment management to help clients build, manage, grow, and protect their assets through all phases of one’s life and the many transitions in between. If you have any questions or would like to discuss anything further, please give us a call or send us a note. If you are not a client and wish to receive emails notifying you of new posts – no more than once per month – fill out the subscription information in the sidebar to the right. For more frequent updates, follow us on FacebookLinkedIn, or Twitter.  

Important Additional Information & Disclosures

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC-“MFT”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. 

Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MFT. 

Please remember that if you are a MFT client, it remains your responsibility to advise MFT, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MFT is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Tax advice is given only to clients and only when agreed to by MFT. A copy of the MFT’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.

Please Note: MFT does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to MFT’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Please Note: Limitations:  While MFT does NOT pay for recognition, awards, or publicity, neither rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services, publications, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation or certification, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if MFT is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of MFT by any of its clients.  ANY QUESTIONS: MFT’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including providing the criteria used for any reflected ranking.

Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results.  It should not be assumed that your MFT account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your MFT accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request.


About Dan Moisand

Dan Moisand is a fee-only financial advisor with Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo, LLC. He is a regular contributor for multiple outlets, including Florida Today, MarketWatch, and The Wall Street Journal. His writing and financial advice have also been featured in Financial Planning, Investment Advisor, Wealth Manager/Advising Boomers, Forbes, Smart Money, and The New York Times, among other publications. He is the only two-time winner of the Journal of Financial Planning’s “Call for Papers” competition and has been named a top financial planner and advisor by multiple publications. Investment News named Dan one of the “twenty most influential men and women” in the history of financial planning. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for the CFP (Certified Financial Planner) Board.


As a Sanctuary From The Noise®, we only post information we believe timely and important to the long term financial success of our clients. Follow us to receive emails - no more than once a month - about new posts.

We keep your information private and make stopping our emails as easy as starting them.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.